software-risk?ecosystem=npm&package=lodash&version=4.17.15

Known vulnerabilities for one package version from OSV.dev, with CISA exploited-in-the-wild flag and the fixed version.

Known vulnerabilities for one package version from OSV.dev, with CISA exploited-in-the-wild flag and the fixed version. Should I install this? Pass ?package=lodash&ecosystem=npm&version=4.17.15 (npm, PyPI, Go, crates.io, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, Packagist, Hex, Pub) and get every known advisory for that exact version from OSV.dev (GitHub, PyPA, Go and RustSec databases), whether any of them is on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list, severity, and the version that fixes each.

UNRATEDListed

Overview

Grade?

UNRATED

0 of 30 paid calls toward a letter

Price

$0.003 per call

Paid calls

none yet

delivery unknown until someone pays

More info

Seller?

0xd334ab51…dc4217ed

URL

https://apexfaucet.xyz/api/x402/software-risk?ecosystem=npm&package=lodash&version=4.17.15

MCP server on this host: xyz.apexfaucet/apex-x1

Seen

first 3 days ago · last 2 days ago

5 free handshakes

Payment

Pays through

x402

Offered on?

Arc, Base USDC, Solana

Listed on?

Base, Solana

Handshakescomputed 8 hr ago

0.200 from 5 free handshakes over 30 days · UNRATED ?

How the composite of 0.200 is made up, part by part
Component	Weight	Measured	Lower bound ?		Adds	Short ?	Uncertain ?
livenesscosts the most it answered at all	0.60	1.00	0.000		0.000	0	−0.600
latency p95 it answered as fast as its class	0.20	0.00	0.000		0.000	−0.200	0
price stability the price stayed where it was listed	0.20	1.00	1.000		0.200	0	0
Composite	1.00		0.200	gap to 1.000 = 0.800 · 0.200 short · 0.600 uncertain	0.200	−0.200	−0.600

Not measured: correctness · nobody paid; honesty · nobody paid; schema conformance · no answer had a published shape to check

BURN_INFREE_TIER_ONLY

Verify it yourselfnpx teppi-check https://apexfaucet.xyz/api/x402/software-risk?ecosystem=npm&package=lodash&version=4.17.15curl -s https://api.teppi.xyz/v1/trust/cap_01M3V00ASB800EFA82JZ0H5GT7