Server definition

Hash: sha256:ed3d582c805b1a9065693c3ea5a6fef689c213c2aad45d48f0d7186a24836d50
What it is: What a remote MCP server returned when asked what it offers: 7 tools

The blob, as servednamed by its sha256

{
  "instructions": "Query the decided public DOHA security-clearance record: search cases, fetch one case, find similar cases, and compute statistics and timelines. Everything is descriptive of decided public cases; cite the returned URLs.",
  "tools": [
    {
      "description": "How cases with a candor allegation (falsification, omission, or lack of candor) were resolved in the decided record: the favorable rate with vs without such an allegation, when the judge found a deliberate falsification vs when the applicant rebutted it, and when the applicant corrected the record before being confronted. Counts and denominators throughout. Descriptive, never a prediction.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {},
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "get_candor_outcomes",
      "outputSchema": null
    },
    {
      "description": "Fetch one decided DOHA case in full: what was alleged, the judge's findings per allegation, per-guideline formal findings, outcome, judge, representation, and appeal history. Use case_id from search_cases.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "case_id": {
            "description": "The numeric case id from search_cases",
            "type": "integer"
          }
        },
        "required": [
          "case_id"
        ],
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "get_case",
      "outputSchema": null
    },
    {
      "description": "How much time had passed between the most recent conduct and the decision, measured from dates stated in the decisions, for the incident-type concerns (drugs, alcohol, criminal conduct, sexual behavior, protected information, IT misuse). Reports median years before favorable vs unfavorable decisions, with counts. Descriptive association, never a prediction.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "guideline": {
            "description": "Optional single concern letter to scope to: H drugs, G alcohol, J criminal, D sexual behavior, K protected information, M IT misuse",
            "type": "string"
          }
        },
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "get_conduct_recency",
      "outputSchema": null
    },
    {
      "description": "Grant/denial statistics over decided hearing-level DOHA cases, grouped by year or by guideline, always with sample sizes. Same population rules as the site's Insights page.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "by": {
            "description": "Grouping (default year)",
            "enum": [
              "year",
              "guideline"
            ],
            "type": "string"
          },
          "guideline": {
            "description": "Optional single guideline letter A-M to scope to",
            "type": "string"
          },
          "year_from": {
            "type": "integer"
          },
          "year_to": {
            "type": "integer"
          }
        },
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "get_statistics",
      "outputSchema": null
    },
    {
      "description": "Measured DOHA timelines: median days from Statement of Reasons to hearing and to decision, from dates stated in the decisions themselves. Optionally scoped to one decision year.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "year": {
            "description": "Optional decision year to scope to",
            "type": "integer"
          }
        },
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "get_timelines",
      "outputSchema": null
    },
    {
      "description": "Search 30,000+ decided public DOHA security-clearance decisions (1996 to present). Full-text query plus filters. Returns matching cases with outcome, date, guidelines, and a citable URL each.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "guideline": {
            "description": "Single guideline letter A-M (e.g. F = financial, B = foreign influence)",
            "type": "string"
          },
          "level": {
            "description": "Decision level",
            "enum": [
              "hearing",
              "appeal"
            ],
            "type": "string"
          },
          "limit": {
            "description": "Max results, 1-25 (default 10)",
            "type": "integer"
          },
          "outcome": {
            "description": "Final outcome filter",
            "enum": [
              "granted",
              "denied"
            ],
            "type": "string"
          },
          "query": {
            "description": "Full-text search, e.g. \"gambling debts sports betting\"",
            "type": "string"
          },
          "year_from": {
            "description": "Earliest decision year, e.g. 2020",
            "type": "integer"
          },
          "year_to": {
            "description": "Latest decision year",
            "type": "integer"
          }
        },
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "search_cases",
      "outputSchema": null
    },
    {
      "description": "The most similar decided cases to a given case, ranked by how alike the ALLEGATIONS read (never by outcome). Same list shown on the case page.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "case_id": {
            "description": "The numeric case id",
            "type": "integer"
          },
          "limit": {
            "description": "Max results, 1-10 (default 5)",
            "type": "integer"
          }
        },
        "required": [
          "case_id"
        ],
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "similar_cases",
      "outputSchema": null
    }
  ]
}

Verify it yourself

curl -s https://api.teppi.xyz/v1/evidence/sha256:ed3d582c805b1a9065693c3ea5a6fef689c213c2aad45d48f0d7186a24836d50 | sha256sum