Server definition
- Hash
- sha256:730cbad4664e8bd36c2873c42bd4b51d8c6b6c484026770a1bd087926d398a75
- What it is
- What a remote MCP server returned when asked what it offers: 18 tools
The blob, as servednamed by its sha256
{
"instructions": "Legal research tools backed by syfert.com: 10.7M U.S. opinions (all states + federal), Syfertize treatment flags, and statute corpora for all 50 states + DC - 44 of them carry that state's COURT RULES in the same corpus (kind=\"rule\"; not ks, la, nh, ok, sd, vt) - plus the Florida Administrative Code and USC/CFR/federal rules (search_statutes takes state=\"xx\"; get_statute takes the two-letter code). A typical path: (0) a doctrine name or fact pattern -> find_issues(state=\"xx\"): the doctrine as courts in that state name it, the cases on each side (followed_by / questioned_by), the statutes those opinions construe, and where else it is alive; questioned_by is the half that changes answers. (0b) a proposition or quoted language -> find_authority, pasted verbatim. (1) a party name, statute number or keywords -> search_cases (state=\"xx\" = one state's courts) or search_statutes. (2) get_case / get_statute read it. (3) check_citation verifies a citation before it goes into a document: it catches hallucinated cites and name mismatches, expected_case_name resolves a cite newer than the reporter index by name + decision date, and statute, regulation and rule cites against their corpus. (3b) check_brief audits a finished draft in one pass (citations, case names, quotes, statutes, rules) and lists corrections. Quotation marks mean pasted from a tool result; verify_quote checks a quote typed from memory, and its best_match replaces it. (3c) get_propositions shows what courts actually cite a case for, each with its own flag and a quote_integrity verdict ('absent' = not in the opinion); get_citing_cases gives judge-written parentheticals; find_related_cases expands a case into its doctrinal line. (4) get_treatment says whether a case is still good law (red = overruled, yellow = questioned), names who overruled it (overruled_by), suggests replacements (still_good_companions) and carries risk_signals. get_statute also returns Notes of Decisions, for USC/CFR a treatment banner, and currency: statute text is the edition held, not the law on every date, so for crimes, contracts, limitations or procedure the operative date comes first, passed as as_of. Case rows carry bluebook, url and usually link_md; a passage's cite_as is bluebook + its pin page. cross_references on a statute hold amendments no case law has reached yet. Coverage after ~2020 is partial in some regional reporters: a check_citation miss on a recent case may be a gap, not a hallucination. Anonymous use is limited to 20 calls per day; registering at https://syfert.com/mcp/ is free and lifts the cap.",
"tools": [
{
"description": "Audit ALL citations in a draft brief, motion, or memo at once (wraps syfert.com Brief Check). Extracts every reporter citation, verifies each exists, checks the case name the document claims against the real case (hallucination detection), checks each quoted passage word for word against the cited opinion's own text (misquote = not in that opinion; unquoted_by_courts = the text could not be compared and no court has quoted those words from the case: check it with verify_quote), traces an unmatched quote to the case the language actually ORIGINATES in (quote_origin: attribute with \"(quoting …)\" or cite the source), and returns treatment flags with replacement suggestions for red-flagged authority. Also audits every STATUTE, REGULATION and COURT-RULE citation in the document against the corpus that holds it, reported separately under \"statutes\" (verified=false means not found in that corpus, which is not proof the section is wrong). ALWAYS run this on a finished draft before delivering it. Use mode=attack on an OPPONENT's brief to get ammunition: distinguishing and criticizing citers for each of their cites. Text over the size cap (128KB anonymous, 512KB with a token) is cut before the audit and the response then carries stats.truncated_bytes plus an INCOMPLETE AUDIT warning. corrections lists every quote the cited opinion does not carry verbatim, with replace_with (the opinion's own words, or, for verdict statute_text / statute_misquote / rule_text, the statute's or rule's own words) and star_page, and every unresolved or name-mismatched citation. Each unresolved citation carries verdict (exists_unindexed = a real case our index lacks, confirmed by a citing opinion or by name -- keep it; not_indexed = unknown, weigh volume_coverage (thin 2019+ volumes make a miss weak evidence); interior_mismatch/strong = likely fabricated), so do not report every unresolved cite as a hallucination (MCP13_20260925). A pinpoint page written as a citation of its own is status pin_reference (stats.pin_references, not unresolved) and its correction gives cite_as (first page, then pin). Public-domain cites (\"2023 IL App (1st) 220520\", \"2023-Ohio-1234\") are read like reporter cites, and a paragraph pinpoint (\"¶ 45\", \"¶¶ 12-14\") is checked against the opinion's paragraph numbers: cites[].para_pin.verdict interior_pin / interior_mismatch, quote_checks[].para_pin.inside says whether a quotation sits in the pinned paragraph; a mismatch is also a correction (MCP17_20260925). Each verified statute finding carries currency (edition, current-through, last amendment where recorded) and statutes.corpus_currency the edition of each corpus: a brief about past conduct needs the text in force on the operative date (check_citation or get_statute with as_of). Pass forum (the court you will file in, e.g. forum=\"ca9\" or forum=\"fl\") to have each unpublished cited case checked against the citation rules of that court: cites[].citability.forum.may_cite is yes / persuasive / conditional / no, or unsure when our verified rules data cannot settle it for that court (it says why: another court system, a district court applying a circuit rule, a pre-2007 federal disposition in another circuit, or a rule that is an open question on the citability review page). An unresolved citation printed in the corpus only by opinions that say it does not exist (sanctions / show-cause orders on fabricated citations) is verdict strong, verdict_evidence cited_as_fabricated, with fabricated_citers.",
"inputSchema": {
"properties": {
"forum": {
"description": "Optional. The court the document will be filed in: a court id (fla, ca9, texapp, flsd, scotus) or a two-letter state code / state name (fl, TX, New York). Unpublished cited cases are then checked against the citation rules that apply in THAT court (cites[].citability.forum); without it the issuing court's own rule is reported.",
"type": "string"
},
"max_cites": {
"description": "Max citations to process (default 100, max 200)",
"type": "integer"
},
"mode": {
"description": "defend (default): audit your own draft. attack: treat the text as the opponent's brief and return ammunition against their cites.",
"enum": [
"defend",
"attack"
],
"type": "string"
},
"text": {
"description": "The full document text (up to 512KB)",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"text"
],
"type": "object"
},
"name": "check_brief",
"outputSchema": null
},
{
"description": "Verify a legal citation actually exists before using it. CASES: returns the real case at that citation, its treatment flag, and (if expected_case_name given) whether the name matches. This catches hallucinated or miscopied citations. A reporter cite that is not indexed comes back with a verdict, and the verdict is what to act on (MCP13_20260925): exists_unindexed = the case is REAL (a court in the corpus prints this exact citation, see cited_by_corpus, or the case is found by name and year, see name_candidates) and only our reporter index lacks it -- never call it a hallucination; not_indexed = no evidence either way, read volume_coverage: for 2019+ volumes of the state regional reporters we often index under 30% of the cases (coverage_pct), so a miss there is weak evidence; interior_mismatch / strong = the page provably sits inside a differently named case, or the volume is complete and nothing turns up by name -- treat as likely fabricated; name_mismatch = opinions in the corpus print this citation for a DIFFERENTLY named case (cited_by_corpus.examples[].printed_as): the cite is real but not the case you named -- fix the name or the cite. Local misses are also re-checked LIVE against CourtListener. STATUTES, REGULATIONS AND COURT RULES: a citation that is not a reporter cite is checked against the corpus that holds it (50 states + DC, 44 states' court rules, the Florida Administrative Code, USC/CFR/federal rules/USSG) and comes back with type, verified, the canonical citation, title, url and link_md; verified=false carries nearby sections and a coverage note, and is NEVER proof the section does not exist. ALWAYS use this to verify any citation that will appear in a legal document. With quote, the quoted words are checked against the opinion the cite resolves to (quote_check, the verify_quote block). PROPOSITION-LEVEL TREATMENT (MCP14_20260925): pass proposition (what you cite the case for; quote is used when proposition is absent) and treatment.proposition names the one proposition citing courts cite it for that matches, with its OWN flag, and treatment.proposition_note says when that point is flagged although the case is green (or unflagged although the case is red); \"no proposition-level signal for this use\" means only the case-level flag applies. PUBLIC-DOMAIN CITES AND ¶ PINPOINTS (MCP17_20260925): vendor-neutral cites are read as the courts print them (\"2023 IL App (1st) 220520\", \"2023-Ohio-1234\", \"2022-NMCA-063\", \"2021 IL App (1st) 200563-U\", \"2019 S.D. 9\"); a paragraph pinpoint (\"¶ 45\", \"¶¶ 12-14\", \"at ¶ 7\") on a resolved cite is checked against the opinion's own paragraph numbers: paragraph_pin.verdict interior_pin = that paragraph exists (paragraph_text shows it), interior_mismatch = past the last numbered paragraph, a number the opinion skips, or (with quote) the quotation sits in another paragraph (found_at, suggested); null = the text carries no paragraph numbers, not checked. The top-level verdict stays found. A verified statute, regulation or rule also returns currency + temporal_note (the edition held, current-through, last amendment where recorded); with as_of, temporal_warning comes first when the section changed after that date. OPERATIVE DATE: statute text is the edition this corpus holds, not the law on every date. For a crime, a contract, a limitations period or a procedural step, establish the operative date first (offense, contract, accrual or filing date) and pass it as as_of (YYYY-MM-DD); say so when the text postdates the facts, since an older offense may be charged under a predecessor section. A statute whose status is sunset, future, expired or repealed leads with status_warning (sunset_date, successor). So does a U.S. Code section omitted from the Code (status omitted). A citing opinion that says the cited case does not exist (a sanctions or show-cause order about fabricated citations, Mata v. Avianca) is never counted as evidence: such citers are listed in fabricated_citers, and when they are the only ones the verdict is strong with verdict_evidence cited_as_fabricated (likely fabricated). Clusters that look like one decision filed twice but share no docket number are listed as twin_candidates (not folded). A CFR section removed from the eCFR is status removed (status_warning REMOVED, currency.sunset_date = the removal's effective date).",
"inputSchema": {
"properties": {
"as_of": {
"description": "Optional operative date, YYYY-MM-DD (offense, contract, accrual or filing date). When the section was amended or enacted after it, the answer leads with temporal_warning (severity amended_after | enacted_after | text_older_than_as_of | unknown_history), the history note and, when this corpus kept it, the prior text (prior_text_available); otherwise as_of_check says no later change is recorded. On or after a held successor version's operative date, as_of_version carries that version's text.",
"type": "string"
},
"citation": {
"description": "The citation, e.g. \"819 So. 2d 732\", \"Siegle v. Progressive, 819 So. 2d 732 (Fla. 2002)\", \"Fla. Stat. § 83.49\", \"Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510\", \"42 U.S.C. § 1983\", \"N.C. R. App. P. 10\"",
"type": "string"
},
"expected_case_name": {
"description": "Case name the citation is claimed to belong to, for mismatch detection. Also lets a citation newer than the reporter index resolve by name + decision date: same-name cases in the window come back as name_candidates",
"type": "string"
},
"proposition": {
"description": "Optional: the point you cite this case for (a sentence of your draft or a paraphrase); returns treatment.proposition and treatment.proposition_note, the treatment of that proposition",
"type": "string"
},
"quote": {
"description": "Optional: words you quote from this case; returns quote_check (verbatim | near | absent, best_match, star_page)",
"type": "string"
},
"state": {
"description": "Optional two-letter state code, used only for statute/rule cites: settles a form two states both recognise, and resolves forms the corpus registry cannot classify. Ignored for case citations",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"citation"
],
"type": "object"
},
"name": "check_citation",
"outputSchema": null
},
{
"description": "Optional. If your client can save files locally and you want a readable copy of a case or statute, this returns the complete document to save; otherwise use get_case / get_statute as before. The document is the syfert.com page as the website renders it (caption, headings, footnotes, star-page markers such as [*551], links to the cited cases): Markdown with YAML front matter (default) or one self-contained HTML file. Returns filename, format, bytes, document and note; the MCP cannot write to disk, so saving document under filename is up to you. A case: cluster_id, or citation (+ case_name). A statute or rule: jurisdiction + citation, as get_statute takes them. A document longer than one response comes in parts (truncated, next_offset): call again with offset and append the parts in order.",
"inputSchema": {
"properties": {
"case_name": {
"description": "Case name; lets a citation newer than the reporter index resolve by name + date",
"type": "string"
},
"citation": {
"description": "A case's reporter citation (\"875 F.2d 994\"; used if cluster_id is absent), or, with jurisdiction, the section or rule (\"90.803\", \"Nev. J. Ct. R. Civ. P. 70\")",
"type": "string"
},
"cluster_id": {
"description": "Cluster id of the case",
"type": "integer"
},
"format": {
"description": "markdown (default) or html",
"enum": [
"markdown",
"html"
],
"type": "string"
},
"include": {
"description": "Sections. Cases: text (the opinion), treatment (flag and strongest signal), propositions (what courts cite it for), cited_by_top (leading citing cases with their parentheticals), scope (how far a red or yellow flag reaches). Statutes: text, cited_by_top (Notes of Decisions), scope (source and scrape date). Default [\"text\",\"treatment\",\"scope\"].",
"items": {
"enum": [
"text",
"treatment",
"propositions",
"cited_by_top",
"scope"
],
"type": "string"
},
"type": "array"
},
"jurisdiction": {
"description": "For a statute or rule: the corpus, as get_statute takes it (two-letter state code, usc, cfr, fedrule, sg, fac …)",
"type": "string"
},
"offset": {
"description": "Byte offset of the next part (next_offset from the previous call) for a long document",
"type": "integer"
}
},
"type": "object"
},
"name": "export_document",
"outputSchema": null
},
{
"description": "Find the case to cite for a proposition. Paste the proposition or the language you need authority for VERBATIM; do not convert it to keywords. The result names the source case to cite (source_case), the verbatim passage, and how many courts have adopted it (quoted_by_cases); match_kind says how it matched: exact_phrase (the passage contains your words), relaxed (it shares your distinctive words), proposition (a rule later courts cite that case for). A miss means no court has quoted or been cited for that wording; try find_issues for the doctrine, or search_cases with 3-4 distinctive words. Routing: a proposition or quoted language -> find_authority (pasted verbatim); a doctrine name or fact pattern -> find_issues; a party name, statute number or keywords -> search_cases. Quotation marks mean pasted from a tool result (opinion text, passage, best_match). If you typed a quote from memory, run verify_quote and use best_match. Run check_brief on the finished draft and apply its corrections. Copy cite_as for the citation (first page, then pin). The first 3 rows carry star_page and cite_as.",
"inputSchema": {
"properties": {
"proposition": {
"description": "The proposition or quoted language, verbatim (three or more words; up to ~300 characters are used)",
"type": "string"
},
"state": {
"description": "Optional two-letter state code: relaxed and proposition matches are limited to that state's courts (falls back to all courts when it has none); verbatim exact-phrase matches from any court are kept, that state's first",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"proposition"
],
"type": "object"
},
"name": "find_authority",
"outputSchema": null
},
{
"description": "Fast direct lookup: give a citation or a case caption and get THE case (or 'not decisive' with up to 5 candidates) without a full-text search. Use search_cases for topics and words. A citation (\"384 U.S. 436\", \"Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444 (1966)\", \"449 F. App'x 901\", \"2019-Ohio-10\") resolves through the reporter index; when a case name is given (in the query or as expected_case_name) and the case at that citation carries a different name, the answer is NOT decisive (problem name_mismatch) and names the case that is really there. A caption (\"Miranda v. Arizona\", or one distinctive name such as \"Celotex\") is decisive only when the top match is at least twice as strong as the runner-up; common captions (\"Smith v. Jones\", \"State v. Johnson\") are not decisive by design. The answer carries case (bluebook, url, link_md, treatment_flag), kind (citation|caption), decisive, candidates, and a note when not decisive.",
"inputSchema": {
"properties": {
"court": {
"description": "Optional court id filter for a caption (same syntax as search_cases court); takes precedence over state",
"type": "string"
},
"expected_case_name": {
"description": "The case name the citation is supposed to be; the answer is not decisive when the case at the citation carries a different name",
"type": "string"
},
"query": {
"description": "A citation or a case caption, e.g. \"410 U.S. 113\", \"Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)\", \"Roe v. Wade\", \"Celotex\"",
"type": "string"
},
"state": {
"description": "Optional two-letter state code (or name) narrowing a caption to that state's own courts",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"query"
],
"type": "object"
},
"name": "find_case",
"outputSchema": null
},
{
"description": "Resolve a court name to court_id values usable in the search_cases court filter. Also resolves whole GROUPS of courts (tribal courts, veterans, bankruptcy, all U.S. district courts) to the single aggregate token that filters on all of them: see court_groups in the result.",
"inputSchema": {
"properties": {
"name": {
"description": "Court name or group, e.g. \"Florida\", \"Eleventh Circuit\", \"Texas Supreme\", \"Navajo Nation\", \"tribal courts\", \"veterans\", \"bankruptcy\"",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"name"
],
"type": "object"
},
"name": "find_court",
"outputSchema": null
},
{
"description": "ENTRY BY ISSUE. Use this FIRST when the question arrives as facts or an issue rather than a case name (\"can the appellate court affirm on a ground the trial court never reached\", \"impact rule emotional distress\", \"Fabre defendant\"). Returns (1) the doctrine as courts in that STATE actually name it, with the cases on EACH side (followed_by / questioned_by, from how each citing opinion treated the case), example sentences judges wrote, the statutes those opinions construe, and every state where the phrase is alive with its year span (a doctrine retained in one state and abandoned elsewhere shows as a stalled span); and (2) the matching mined propositions (the rule text courts quote) with per-passage flags. Doctrine name is not case health: an issue can be alive while its anchor case is red. Read questioned_by before relying on followed_by. A q of more than 8 substantive words is read as a proposition: propositions (matched against all of it) come first. The default answer holds 3 issues and 5 statutes and stays under ~12,000 characters (issues_omitted counts the rest); max_issues or detail=true returns more. Routing: a proposition or quoted language -> find_authority (pasted verbatim); a doctrine name or fact pattern -> find_issues; a party name, statute number or keywords -> search_cases. ",
"inputSchema": {
"properties": {
"detail": {
"description": "true = the full-size answer: 8 issues, 8 statutes each, no character budget",
"type": "boolean"
},
"max_issues": {
"description": "Default 3 (8 with detail=true), max 20",
"type": "integer"
},
"q": {
"description": "The issue or doctrine in 2-6 words as a lawyer would name it: \"tipsy coachman\", \"economic loss rule\", \"Stand Your Ground immunity\", \"Richardson hearing\"",
"type": "string"
},
"state": {
"description": "Two-letter state code of the CITING courts (fl, ga, tx, ny ...). Strongly recommended: the map is keyed per state. Omit to search all states.",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"q"
],
"type": "object"
},
"name": "find_issues",
"outputSchema": null
},
{
"description": "Expand research from one good case: returns the doctrinal family it belongs to: the line of frequently co-cited cases around an anchor authority (curated set of ~1,500 major doctrinal lines; landmark cases only). Use when you have one on-point case and need the rest of the line. A case in no family gets its own most co-cited cases instead (related_source \"co_citation\"; MCP22_20260927).",
"inputSchema": {
"properties": {
"case_name": {
"description": "Case name; lets a citation newer than the reporter index resolve by name + date (candidates returned if several share the name)",
"type": "string"
},
"citation": {
"description": "Reporter citation (used if cluster_id absent)",
"type": "string"
},
"cluster_id": {
"description": "Cluster id of the case",
"type": "integer"
},
"max_cases": {
"description": "Default 15, max 40",
"type": "integer"
}
},
"type": "object"
},
"name": "find_related_cases",
"outputSchema": null
},
{
"description": "Fetch one case: metadata, parallel citations, treatment flag, and full opinion text (paginated via offset/max_chars). cited_by is CourtListener's citation count; for a decision filed as several twin clusters it is summed over them (cited_by_note says so), and a duplicate or stub twin id is answered with its survivor (note says so). Citations inside the returned text are checked against the reporter index (embedded_citations); citation_warnings names any the court itself got wrong. Identify the case by cluster_id (from search_cases results) or by reporter citation. find_text returns passages: up to 5 sentence-bounded windows holding a phrase (or its closest match) with star_page and offset, so a long opinion need not be paged (pass include_text=false to get only those); quotable=true adds quotable_passages, the passages of this opinion other courts quote. Quotation marks mean pasted from a tool result (opinion text, passage, best_match). If you typed a quote from memory, run verify_quote and use best_match. Run check_brief on the finished draft and apply its corrections. Copy cite_as for the citation (first page, then pin).",
"inputSchema": {
"properties": {
"case_name": {
"description": "Case name; used only when the citation is not in the reporter index (newer than it): resolves by name + decision-date window and returns candidates if several cases share the name",
"type": "string"
},
"citation": {
"description": "Reporter citation, e.g. \"819 So. 2d 732\" (used if cluster_id absent)",
"type": "string"
},
"cluster_id": {
"description": "Cluster id from search results",
"type": "integer"
},
"find_text": {
"description": "A phrase to locate in the opinion: returns passages (exact, or the closest match) with star_page and offset",
"type": "string"
},
"include_text": {
"description": "Include opinion text (default true)",
"type": "boolean"
},
"max_chars": {
"description": "Max characters of opinion text to return (default 40000, max 150000)",
"type": "integer"
},
"offset": {
"description": "Character offset for paging long opinions (use next_offset from a prior call)",
"type": "integer"
},
"quotable": {
"description": "With include_text, also return quotable_passages: the passages of this opinion other courts quote, with star_page",
"type": "boolean"
}
},
"type": "object"
},
"name": "get_case",
"outputSchema": null
},
{
"description": "Full citator list: every ranked case citing this one, with judge-written parentheticals (usable verbatim in a brief), verbatim quotes, pin cites, and the citing court's own Bluebook signal. Filter by flag color. Best for FINDING SUPPORTING AUTHORITY and parentheticals; for comprehensive negative-treatment checking use get_treatment (this list covers only each case's top-ranked ~50 citers).",
"inputSchema": {
"properties": {
"case_name": {
"description": "Case name; lets a citation newer than the reporter index resolve by name + date (candidates returned if several share the name)",
"type": "string"
},
"citation": {
"description": "Reporter citation (used if cluster_id absent)",
"type": "string"
},
"cluster_id": {
"description": "Cluster id of the case",
"type": "integer"
},
"flag_filter": {
"description": "Comma list of flag colors to include: red,yellow,green,neutral,procedural. Omit for all.",
"type": "string"
},
"max_citers": {
"description": "Default 25, max 100",
"type": "integer"
}
},
"type": "object"
},
"name": "get_citing_cases",
"outputSchema": null
},
{
"description": "What is this case actually cited FOR? Returns the distinct legal propositions courts cite the case for (headnote-grade), each with its OWN treatment flag and counts. A case can be good law on one proposition and overruled on another. Use before citing a case for a specific point, and to find the strongest proposition to cite it for. passage is the opinion's own wording of the proposition with its star_page; passage null means citing courts paraphrase it. Pass proposition (your use of the case) to get proposition_match, the one proposition it matches, and proposition_note (MCP14_20260925). Quotation marks mean pasted from a tool result (opinion text, passage, best_match). If you typed a quote from memory, run verify_quote and use best_match. Run check_brief on the finished draft and apply its corrections. Copy cite_as for the citation (first page, then pin).",
"inputSchema": {
"properties": {
"case_name": {
"description": "Case name; lets a citation newer than the reporter index resolve by name + date (candidates returned if several share the name)",
"type": "string"
},
"citation": {
"description": "Reporter citation (used if cluster_id absent)",
"type": "string"
},
"cluster_id": {
"description": "Cluster id of the case",
"type": "integer"
},
"max_propositions": {
"description": "Default 10, max 25",
"type": "integer"
},
"proposition": {
"description": "Optional: the point you cite this case for; returns proposition_match + proposition_note",
"type": "string"
}
},
"type": "object"
},
"name": "get_propositions",
"outputSchema": null
},
{
"description": "Fetch the full text of a statute, rule, or code section: the current codification in the edition this corpus holds. Every answer carries currency (edition, current_through, current_through_basis, last_verified, text_last_changed = when our copy last changed, last_amended_year, effective_date, history_note, status, successor, versions_available) and temporal_note. OPERATIVE DATE: statute text is the edition this corpus holds, not the law on every date. For a crime, a contract, a limitations period or a procedural step, establish the operative date first (offense, contract, accrual or filing date) and pass it as as_of (YYYY-MM-DD); say so when the text postdates the facts, since an older offense may be charged under a predecessor section. With as_of, a section amended or enacted after that date returns temporal_warning FIRST, with the history note and, where this corpus kept it, the prior text (prior_text_available; most corpora keep none). A repealed or renumbered section returns status_warning with its successor. currency.status is current | sunset (operative until currency.sunset_date; successor names the version that takes over) | future (not yet operative; effective_date is when it starts) | expired | repealed | renumbered, and anything but current leads with status_warning. Where the later version is held (California sections with more than one version), as_of on or after its operative date returns that text in as_of_version. A U.S. Code section can also be omitted (dropped from the Code by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel and no longer printed; not a repeal): it leads with status_warning too, and the history note says why. A CFR section removed from the eCFR is status removed: status_warning REMOVED names the removal's effective date (currency.sunset_date) and the eCFR point-in-time link for the text in force before it.",
"inputSchema": {
"properties": {
"as_of": {
"description": "Optional operative date, YYYY-MM-DD (offense, contract, accrual or filing date). When the section was amended or enacted after it, the answer leads with temporal_warning (severity amended_after | enacted_after | text_older_than_as_of | unknown_history), the history note and, when this corpus kept it, the prior text (prior_text_available); otherwise as_of_check says no later change is recorded. On or after a held successor version's operative date, as_of_version carries that version's text.",
"type": "string"
},
"citation": {
"description": "Section as commonly cited: \"83.49\", \"16-5-1\", \"174.02\". Multi-code states (TX/CA/NY) need the code name too: \"Tex. Penal Code 22.01\".",
"type": "string"
},
"jurisdiction": {
"description": "Which corpus: any two-letter state code (all 50 states + dc), or fl_statute (Fla. Stat.), fl_rule (FL court rules), fac (Florida Administrative Code, \"6A-6.03019\"), ga (O.C.G.A.), usc, cfr, fedrule, sg (sentencing guidelines). A state's COURT RULES live in the SAME corpus as its statutes — pass the state code and cite the rule as lawyers there do: \"TRCP 166a\" (tx), \"MCR 2.116\"/\"MRE 403\" (mi), \"C.R.C.P. 56\" (co), \"CR 56\"/\"RAP 2.5\" (wa), \"Ohio Civ. R. 56\" (oh), \"Pa.R.C.P. 1035.2\" (pa), \"R. 4:46-2\"/\"N.J.R.E. 403\" (nj), \"Md. Rule 2-501\" (md), \"I.R.C.P. 56\" (id), \"Conn. Practice Book § 23-8\" (ct), \"N.C. R. App. P. 10\" (nc), \"Cal. R. Ct. 8.204\" (ca), \"22 NYCRR 1250.1\" (ny), \"Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56\" (tn), \"Ga. Sup. Ct. R. 41\" (ga). Rules are in-corpus for all 44 of: ak al ar az ca co ct dc de fl ga hi ia id il in ky ma md me mi mn mo ms mt nc nd ne nj nm nv ny oh or pa ri sc tn tx ut va wa wi wv wy. ks la nh ok sd vt keep no separate rules set — theirs are codified AS statutes (\"S.D. Codified Laws § 15-6-10(a)\", \"K.S.A. 60-256\"), and so are the Hawaii evidence rules (\"Haw. Rev. Stat. § 626-1, Rule 403\").",
"type": "string"
},
"max_chars": {
"description": "Max characters of body text (default 40000)",
"type": "integer"
},
"offset": {
"description": "Character offset for paging long sections",
"type": "integer"
}
},
"required": [
"jurisdiction",
"citation"
],
"type": "object"
},
"name": "get_statute",
"outputSchema": null
},
{
"description": "Is this case still good law? Returns the Syfertize treatment flag (red = overruled/superseded, yellow = questioned/distinguished, green = followed, procedural = cert/rehearing denied) plus the citing cases behind each signal with quoted context. A case can be green overall and red on the proposition you need it for (MCP14_20260925): propositions_summary lists the propositions courts cite it for (most-cited first), each with its OWN flag; pass proposition (your use of the case) and proposition_match returns the one that matches, with its negative_citers, and treatment.proposition_note states the result (\"no proposition-level signal for this use\" = only the case-level flag applies).",
"inputSchema": {
"properties": {
"case_name": {
"description": "Case name; lets a citation newer than the reporter index resolve by name + date (candidates returned if several share the name)",
"type": "string"
},
"citation": {
"description": "Reporter citation (used if cluster_id absent)",
"type": "string"
},
"cluster_id": {
"description": "Cluster id of the case",
"type": "integer"
},
"max_citers": {
"description": "Max citing-case detail rows (default 25, max 100; negative signals sort first)",
"type": "integer"
},
"proposition": {
"description": "Optional: the point you cite this case for, in your words or as quoted; returns proposition_match (that proposition's own flag and negative citers) and treatment.proposition_note",
"type": "string"
}
},
"type": "object"
},
"name": "get_treatment",
"outputSchema": null
},
{
"description": "Full-text search over 10.7M U.S. court opinions (all states + federal, via syfert.com). Call this to find case law on a topic, locate a case by name, or find cases citing a statute. Routing: a proposition or quoted language -> find_authority (pasted verbatim); a doctrine name or fact pattern -> find_issues; a party name, statute number or keywords -> search_cases. Each hit carries bluebook and url (snippet up to 240 chars); a hit whose snippet quotes an earlier case carries passage_origin, the case to cite for that language. A q that is one citation or an \"X v. Y\" caption naming one case decisively also returns that case as direct_hit above the results (find_case does only that lookup). Query syntax: boolean AND/OR/NOT, \"exact phrases\", proximity (term1 w/5 term2), wildcards (neglig*), and field filters inside q (name:, judge:, syllabus:). Statute-style numbers like 83.49 are matched as citations to that statute. total may be null: a court or date filter makes the exact count too expensive to compute, and total_pages + total_note then carry the scale. partial: true means the time budget was hit; see partial_note. tier names the caller's plan; _source names the backend that served the search: xeric = the dedicated index, cloud = the cloud index behind a short queue. When no opinion holds every word of a long query, the answer may carry relaxed=true with relaxed_note and relaxed_terms_kept / relaxed_terms_dropped: its rows (closest_match) hold only the kept words.",
"inputSchema": {
"properties": {
"compact": {
"description": "true = shorter rows (bluebook, url, date_filed, cited_by, status if not published, treatment flag and red/yellow counts, snippet, holding, passage_origin); default false",
"type": "boolean"
},
"court": {
"description": "Court id filter, comma-separable, trailing * for prefix. E.g. fla* (all Florida), scotus, ca11, fladistctapp1. Also takes a group token covering a whole set of courts: us-circuits, us-districts, us-bankr, fl-fed-districts, fed-veterans, fed-military, fed-immigration, fed-taxtrade, tribal-navajonation, tribal-cherokee. Use find_court to resolve either. Takes precedence over state.",
"type": "string"
},
"date_from": {
"description": "YYYY-MM-DD",
"type": "string"
},
"date_to": {
"description": "YYYY-MM-DD",
"type": "string"
},
"judge": {
"description": "Judge name filter",
"type": "string"
},
"page": {
"description": "Page number, default 1",
"type": "integer"
},
"per_page": {
"description": "Results per page, default 10, max 20",
"type": "integer"
},
"q": {
"description": "Search query. Examples: \"premises liability\" AND negligence; name:miranda; 768.28 sovereign immunity",
"type": "string"
},
"sort": {
"description": "Default relevance (authority-weighted).",
"enum": [
"relevance",
"date",
"cited",
"trending"
],
"type": "string"
},
"state": {
"description": "Two-letter state code (fl, tx, ny, ca ... all 50 states + dc). Scopes the search to that state's OWN courts — supreme, appellate, circuit and county. Federal district and bankruptcy courts sitting in the state count as federal here, not as state courts, so they are excluded; add them with the court argument. Ignored if court is also given.",
"type": "string"
},
"status": {
"description": "published or unpublished",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"q"
],
"type": "object"
},
"name": "search_cases",
"outputSchema": null
},
{
"description": "Find every case that has quoted a phrase. Phrase-matched search over 4.3M distinct passages quoted by two or more opinions, ranked by how many cases quote them. Use it to (a) find the true source of half-remembered language BEFORE attributing it, and (b) locate the canonical wording of a rule. Returns the passage, its source case, and adoption counts. When no passage has the exact phrase it falls back to passages sharing its distinctive words (match_kind relaxed), and it adds the mined propositions later courts cite a case for (match_kind proposition). Same tool as find_authority. Routing: a proposition or quoted language -> find_authority (pasted verbatim); a doctrine name or fact pattern -> find_issues; a party name, statute number or keywords -> search_cases. Quotation marks mean pasted from a tool result (opinion text, passage, best_match). If you typed a quote from memory, run verify_quote and use best_match. Run check_brief on the finished draft and apply its corrections. Copy cite_as for the citation (first page, then pin). The first 3 rows carry star_page and cite_as.",
"inputSchema": {
"properties": {
"quote": {
"description": "The phrase to search for (three or more words; matched as a phrase, not keywords)",
"type": "string"
},
"state": {
"description": "Optional two-letter state code: relaxed and proposition matches are limited to that state's courts (falls back to all courts when it has none); verbatim exact-phrase matches from any court are kept, that state's first",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"quote"
],
"type": "object"
},
"name": "search_quotes",
"outputSchema": null
},
{
"description": "Search statutes, COURT RULES and codes by citation or topic, for EVERY U.S. state plus federal. For a specific state, pass state=\"wi\" (any two-letter code, all 50 states + DC) and a topic or section number; add kind=\"rule\" for that state's court rules or kind=\"statute\" for its code. Without state it searches only the kinds named in kinds (default: Florida). Handles citation lookups (\"83.49\", \"174.02\") and topic queries (\"dog bite strict liability\"). Each result carries currency (text_last_changed and, where recorded, last_amended_year / effective_date / status / successor) and corpus_currency gives each corpus's edition and current-through date. OPERATIVE DATE: statute text is the edition this corpus holds, not the law on every date. For a crime, a contract, a limitations period or a procedural step, establish the operative date first (offense, contract, accrual or filing date) and pass it as as_of (YYYY-MM-DD); say so when the text postdates the facts, since an older offense may be charged under a predecessor section. (as_of is taken by get_statute and check_citation.)",
"inputSchema": {
"properties": {
"kind": {
"description": "With state: scope to one source — \"rule\" (that state's court rules) or \"statute\" (its code). Omit to search both; the response's sources field lists what the corpus holds and how many rows of each.",
"type": "string"
},
"kinds": {
"description": "Used only when state is absent. Comma list of corpus kinds: statute (FL statutes), rule (FL court rules), fac (Fla. Admin. Code), ocga, usc, cfr, fedrule, sg, plus any state's own kind (\"nc\", \"tx\") and rules kind (\"nc-rule\", \"tx-rule\"). Default \"statute,rule\" is FLORIDA ONLY.",
"type": "string"
},
"limit": {
"description": "Max hits (default 5, max 25)",
"type": "integer"
},
"q": {
"description": "Citation or topic query, max 200 chars",
"type": "string"
},
"state": {
"description": "Two-letter state code to search that state's corpus (e.g. wi, tx, ny, ca). Covers all 50 states + dc. That corpus holds the state's COURT RULES too in 44 of the 51 — all but ks, la, nh, ok, sd, vt, whose rules of procedure are codified as statutes. Also accepts state=\"fac\" for the Florida ADMINISTRATIVE Code (agency rules such as 6A-6.03019) — state=\"fl\" is the Florida Statutes.",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"q"
],
"type": "object"
},
"name": "search_statutes",
"outputSchema": null
},
{
"description": "Crowdsourced AI feedback on a Syfertize treatment flag. When the evidence in front of you (an overruling, abrogating or reinstating opinion, or a later court holding the case is still good law) shows a case's flag is wrong, propose red (no longer good law) or green (still good law) with the SHORTEST possible one-line reason, ideally naming the authority. Only red or green is accepted, not yellow. Identify the case by cluster_id, or by citation (+ case_name). The reason must concern the case's legal status only, never the user's facts, question, client or document. Returns the current flag and what was recorded; a proposal equal to the live flag is not recorded. By calling this you help syfert.com improve its treatment flags through AI feedback. Nothing about your session, user, query or documents is logged: only the case id, the flag you propose, your one-line reason, the authority you name and the date are stored, for human review. Your suggestion does not change the live flag.",
"inputSchema": {
"properties": {
"authority": {
"description": "Optional: citation of the case or statute the reason relies on (max 200 characters)",
"type": "string"
},
"case_name": {
"description": "Optional case name; checked against the case the citation resolves to",
"type": "string"
},
"citation": {
"description": "Reporter citation of the case (used if cluster_id absent), e.g. \"410 U.S. 113\"",
"type": "string"
},
"cluster_id": {
"description": "Cluster id of the case whose flag is wrong",
"type": "integer"
},
"flag": {
"description": "The flag the case should carry: red = no longer good law (overruled, abrogated, superseded); green = still good law",
"enum": [
"red",
"green"
],
"type": "string"
},
"reason": {
"description": "One line, as short as possible (max 280 characters), e.g. \"Overruled by Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Org., 597 U.S. 215 (2022).\"",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"flag",
"reason"
],
"type": "object"
},
"name": "suggest_treatment",
"outputSchema": null
},
{
"description": "Check one quotation against the full text of the opinion it is attributed to, before it goes in quotation marks. Returns verdict (verbatim | near | absent), percent, best_match (the opinion's own sentence, up to ~600 characters), star_page (the last *page marker before it, null when the text carries none), offset (get_case offset), case and advice. near means the opinion says it in other words: paste best_match instead. absent means the words are not in this opinion. Identify the case by cluster_id or reporter citation (case_name helps a citation newer than the reporter index). Quotation marks mean pasted from a tool result (opinion text, passage, best_match). If you typed a quote from memory, run verify_quote and use best_match. Run check_brief on the finished draft and apply its corrections. Copy cite_as for the citation (first page, then pin).",
"inputSchema": {
"properties": {
"case_name": {
"description": "Case name; lets a citation newer than the reporter index resolve by name + date",
"type": "string"
},
"citation": {
"description": "Reporter citation of that case, e.g. \"376 So. 2d 230\" (used if cluster_id absent)",
"type": "string"
},
"cluster_id": {
"description": "Cluster id of the case the quote is attributed to",
"type": "integer"
},
"quote": {
"description": "The quoted words exactly as you intend to use them (three or more words)",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"quote"
],
"type": "object"
},
"name": "verify_quote",
"outputSchema": null
}
]
}Verify it yourself
curl -s https://api.teppi.xyz/v1/evidence/sha256:730cbad4664e8bd36c2873c42bd4b51d8c6b6c484026770a1bd087926d398a75 | sha256sum